- What is the "likelihood" of contamination on, in or under the property?
- If it is likely, then what is the “location and concentration” of the contamination?
To answer these questions we use different types of ESA’s. A Phase I ESA answers the first question, while a Phase II ESA answers the second question.
So how does a Phase I determine that a property is “likely” to be contaminated?
Every ESA is performed by a “Qualified Person” or “QP” (usually with training in a science or engineering). You can think of a QP as a kind of CSI detective. But instead of examining a body, a QP examines a property. And instead of looking for evidence of a crime, a QP looks for evidence of environmental contamination.
The investigative procedures used in CSI and an ESA are remarkably similar. The QP does the following to prepare the Phase I.
- Review Records (surveys, deeds, aerial photos, reports of spills)
- Conduct Interviews (owners, neighbours, employees, tenants)
- Do Site Reconnaissance (look for physical evidence of contamination).
The QP evaluates all the evidence and then writes the Phase I report. If the QP suspects that contamination exists on the property, then the Phase 1 ESA will recommend performing a Phase II ESA, to validate those suspicions.
Next Blog: Environmental Site Assessments - Phase II - 'The Burden of Proof'
No comments:
Post a Comment